You may have noticed that I haven't posted as much on this blog so far this year. This is because I have become the co-editor for the flintknapping journal called Knapper's Quarterly and I have been putting most of my writing efforts towards it.
I highly recommend checking the journal out at http://www.knappersquarterly.com/
There is an downloadable online copy available as well as a hard copy.
Thursday, October 15, 2015
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Flat Artifact Piece---was it ground?
A friend of ours dropped by with an unique artifact piece he found in a cache which contained two core pieces weighing around 3 lbs., three spalls, and two worked preforms that are around 4-5 inches long. This piece was around 8 1/2 inches long and 1 inch thick, all the pieces were covered in cortex. One side was fairly flat across for around 6 inches of the face with some flakes removed around the edges. The other side was completely flat almost across the entire 8 1/2 inch face and had not been flaked. It was so completely flat it looked like a piece would if ran through a rock saw. There appeared to be very small drag marks across the flat side as if it was ground.(unable to show these marks in the picture, actually 3rd picture down you can see marks running long ways the length of the face).
This piece is made of NC Rhyolite which sources of can be found about 30 miles from where this artifact was found.
It is known that Type 1C danish daggers and egyptian gerzean knives were ground. We have speculated in previous articles that the Sweetwater biface was also ground.
Below are some pictures, so what do think, was this piece ground flat? If so, was it intended to be a preform? Or what was the intended purpose? Or if it wasn't ground, how did it get this completely flat?
This is a picture of the completely flat side, as you can see from the ruler placed on top of it, it is as flat as the ruler all the way across.
This piece is made of NC Rhyolite which sources of can be found about 30 miles from where this artifact was found.
It is known that Type 1C danish daggers and egyptian gerzean knives were ground. We have speculated in previous articles that the Sweetwater biface was also ground.
Below are some pictures, so what do think, was this piece ground flat? If so, was it intended to be a preform? Or what was the intended purpose? Or if it wasn't ground, how did it get this completely flat?
This is a picture of the completely flat side, as you can see from the ruler placed on top of it, it is as flat as the ruler all the way across.
This is picture of the completely flat side showing the face, as you can see the flatness runs almost entirely the whole length of the piece at around 7 of the 8 1/2 inches total.
Same side without the ruler.
This is a picture of the face of the other side which had some flakes removed around the edges. It was fairly flat as well across 6 inches of the face, although not completely flat as the other side.
Same side without the ruler.
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Edge to Edge Flaking--Platform Angles and Face Bevels
Edge to Edge Flaking--Platforms Angles and Face Bevel
In this article I will try to explain how Bill Earnhardt does his edge to edge flaking. This type of flaking is fairly complex so I hope I can explain it in a way that makes sense.
The biggest challenge with edge to edge flaking is that you are in a constant state of adjustment for the width of the blade. If just one flake comes up short, the whole piece is ruined and you must start all over.
The two main concerns with edge to edge flaking is the platform angle and the degree of bevel on the face side of the blade where the flake is being removed from. The problem is, as I mentioned, is both of these angles are constantly changing as the blade width changes. I will have pictures to accompany this article showing the difference in degrees of the angle for the longest flake at the widest part of the blade to the shortest flake at the narrow part of the blade.
The angles being shown are for obsidian, keep in mind different materials will change these angles so you will be have to adjust accordingly.
I would estimate the angle of platform at between 95-100 degrees for the longest flakes at the widest part of the blade.(picture 1) The degree of the angle decreases to around 85 for the shorter flakes. (picture 2) So throughout the length of this demonstration piece, we can see a variance in the angle of the platforms by 10-15 degrees. The degree difference could also vary depending on the width and length of the blade, seeing a larger variance with longer wider blades.
The other angle you must adjust is the bevel on the face of the blade where the flake is being removed. For the longest flakes at the widest part of the blade the degree of angle is around 170 degrees.(in relation to the blade being at 180 at straight up). The majority of this angle is formed in the bottom 1/4 of the blade face which corresponds with the end of the flake so you are actually removing less material at that point to keep the flake from stopping short.(picture 3) The bevel angle will increase up to 180 degrees as the blade width narrows and the flakes become shorter.(picture 4). So here again, we are seeing around a 10 degree difference which could also vary depending on the length and width of the blade.
For the flakes in between the widest and shortest widths of the blade, both of these angles for the platform and bevel will be some where in between the degrees given above. I can't give you exact angles for each, because they will change for each individual flake, so it will be up to the flintknapper to adjust for each flake. But atleast in this article, I have given you the parameters to work within.
Picture 5, shows the face of this demo piece and the lengths of flakes as they get longer. This piece is for demostration purposes only, it was not intended to be an actual blade. The last flake was not removed so you could still see the actual angle.
I hope this article and pictures have helped and it makes some sort of sense of what I am trying to relay to the reader.
I have made a video to accompany this article where I show the angles shown in the pictures and I discuss what I am trying to show in the pictures. That video can be viewed on our YouTube channel and it titled "Edge to Edge Angles". A direct link to the video is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAmFpSBJLvk&feature=c4-overview&list=UUkAae6MidBwAAzR9GCnprNg
Or watch it here.
There are also two other videos of Bill doing edge to edge flaking on the YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/BillEarnhardtKnappin
Picture 1
In this article I will try to explain how Bill Earnhardt does his edge to edge flaking. This type of flaking is fairly complex so I hope I can explain it in a way that makes sense.
The biggest challenge with edge to edge flaking is that you are in a constant state of adjustment for the width of the blade. If just one flake comes up short, the whole piece is ruined and you must start all over.
The two main concerns with edge to edge flaking is the platform angle and the degree of bevel on the face side of the blade where the flake is being removed from. The problem is, as I mentioned, is both of these angles are constantly changing as the blade width changes. I will have pictures to accompany this article showing the difference in degrees of the angle for the longest flake at the widest part of the blade to the shortest flake at the narrow part of the blade.
The angles being shown are for obsidian, keep in mind different materials will change these angles so you will be have to adjust accordingly.
I would estimate the angle of platform at between 95-100 degrees for the longest flakes at the widest part of the blade.(picture 1) The degree of the angle decreases to around 85 for the shorter flakes. (picture 2) So throughout the length of this demonstration piece, we can see a variance in the angle of the platforms by 10-15 degrees. The degree difference could also vary depending on the width and length of the blade, seeing a larger variance with longer wider blades.
The other angle you must adjust is the bevel on the face of the blade where the flake is being removed. For the longest flakes at the widest part of the blade the degree of angle is around 170 degrees.(in relation to the blade being at 180 at straight up). The majority of this angle is formed in the bottom 1/4 of the blade face which corresponds with the end of the flake so you are actually removing less material at that point to keep the flake from stopping short.(picture 3) The bevel angle will increase up to 180 degrees as the blade width narrows and the flakes become shorter.(picture 4). So here again, we are seeing around a 10 degree difference which could also vary depending on the length and width of the blade.
For the flakes in between the widest and shortest widths of the blade, both of these angles for the platform and bevel will be some where in between the degrees given above. I can't give you exact angles for each, because they will change for each individual flake, so it will be up to the flintknapper to adjust for each flake. But atleast in this article, I have given you the parameters to work within.
Picture 5, shows the face of this demo piece and the lengths of flakes as they get longer. This piece is for demostration purposes only, it was not intended to be an actual blade. The last flake was not removed so you could still see the actual angle.
I hope this article and pictures have helped and it makes some sort of sense of what I am trying to relay to the reader.
I have made a video to accompany this article where I show the angles shown in the pictures and I discuss what I am trying to show in the pictures. That video can be viewed on our YouTube channel and it titled "Edge to Edge Angles". A direct link to the video is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAmFpSBJLvk&feature=c4-overview&list=UUkAae6MidBwAAzR9GCnprNg
Or watch it here.
There are also two other videos of Bill doing edge to edge flaking on the YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/BillEarnhardtKnappin
Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 3
Picture 4
Picture 5
Sunday, September 8, 2013
Measuring Artifact Piece
At this years Flint Ridge knapin I had the pleasure and honor of measuring an actual artifact piece owned by Tony Podkanowicz. The piece is called a Winged Dickson and it was found in 1958 in McLean Co., IL along the Mackinaw River. The point is very thin at .27 inches thick at the thickest point going down to .16 inches thick near the point. It is 3.2 inches wide, which gives it a W/T ratio of 11.85/1! I would like to thank Mr. Podkanowicz for allowing me to measure this fine artifact piece. Below is a picture of the piece.
Thursday, July 4, 2013
New Gallery
Check out our new gallery at http://pinterest.com/modernknapping/
Also, any piece you see pictured on any of our sites(modern-flintknapping.com, modern-flintknapper.com or here) is for sale, email me for pricing.
Also, any piece you see pictured on any of our sites(modern-flintknapping.com, modern-flintknapper.com or here) is for sale, email me for pricing.
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
Modern Flintknapping Grading System
I just realized for some reason I have never posted any information about the Modern Flintknapping Grading System here on the blog. The grading system was one of the first things we developed back when first starting the Modern Flintknapping website. Instead of putting it all here, I will link a page containing information on the grading system here.
http://modern-flintknapping-gallery.jigsy.com/grading-and-scoring
http://modern-flintknapping-gallery.jigsy.com/grading-and-scoring
Friday, April 19, 2013
Boy Scout Demo and Video/Newspaper Article
We recently did a flintknapping demo for a local Boy Scouts troop. The local newspaper was on hand and also made a video besides the couple we made.
You can find our videos on our YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/BillEarnhardtKnappin
You can view the newspaper's video and read the article at http://www.salisburypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20130303%2FSP01%2F130309932
You can find our videos on our YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/BillEarnhardtKnappin
You can view the newspaper's video and read the article at http://www.salisburypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20130303%2FSP01%2F130309932
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Find us on Facebook at "Modern Flintknapping". http://www.facebook.com/modern.flintknapping
View our videos on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/BillEarnhardtKnappin?feature=mhee
Visit our sister site at http://www.modern-flintknappers.com/
View our videos on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/BillEarnhardtKnappin?feature=mhee
Visit our sister site at http://www.modern-flintknappers.com/
Friday, October 19, 2012
Auger with hole
Below is a dacite Auger needle with a hole through it for the threading of sewing material. In the past Bill has put bigger holes through knife blades(which I need to get pictures of on here) but he has never tried it on an Auger needle. These needles are very delicate and getting a hole through without breaking is not easy.
If you are interested in purchasing this piece please visit our gallery at http://pinterest.com/modernknapping/
If you are interested in purchasing this piece please visit our gallery at http://pinterest.com/modernknapping/
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Clovis
This clovis is made of english flint. It is 8 inches long 2 1/2 inches wide and I estimate it ranges from 3/8 to 1/2 inch thick.(did not measure it with fowler gauge). It is fluted on both sides, one is 3 inches and the other is 2 inches. The top picture shows the flute spalls. It was fluted by free hand percussion using the atlatl method.
If you are interested in purchasing this piece visit http://pinterest.com/modernflintknapping/
If you are interested in purchasing this piece visit http://pinterest.com/modernflintknapping/
Tried to get a picture where flute is easier to see with this one.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Mammoth Clovis #2
Below is another Mammoth Clovis Bill recently made. This Clovis is 10 3/4 inches long, 4 inches wide and fluted on both sides. Both flutes are 3 1/2 inches long and one is 3 inches wide and the other 2 3/4 inches wide. The blade is .76 inches thick and at the end of the flute it is .425 inches thick and .29 inches thick at the beginning of the flute. So the W/T ratio's are 5.3/1 normal, 9.4/1 at end of flute and 13.8/1 at the beginning of the flute.
To better view this blade you can watch a video of it at our YouTube channel at the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OGNw7CWNHs
To better view this blade you can watch a video of it at our YouTube channel at the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OGNw7CWNHs
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Mammoth Clovis fluted on side 2
Here is the other side of the mammoth clovis which was fluted today. Bill wasn't satisfied with the flute because it only ran about 2 inches. We have a video of the fluting on our YouTube channel.
Here is a picture of the platform.
Please visit www.modern-flintknappers.com
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Mammoth Clovis with flute platform
Below is a 11 inch long 4 inch wide Clovis with a 3 1/2 inch flute. The other picture shows the platform for the flute. This flute was done by percussion.We are considering fluting the other side, what do yall think, should we go for it?
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Type 1C Danish Dagger
Back in 2009 I posted about Greg Nunn's Edge to Edge flaking. After viewing Greg's video Bill also made some edge to edge pieces at that time.Since then Bill made a Type 1C Danish dagger with edge to edge flaking, below is a picture. This blade is around 7 inches long.
You can also see a video of this blade at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFyUlvqDcD4
You can also see a video of this blade at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFyUlvqDcD4
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Possible Evidence the Sweetwater blade was ground
In our original article about our theory on how the SWB was made we mentioned that it was possibly ground prior to the flaking. We believe we have found some flat spots or "islands" on the cast as further evidence that the blade was ground prior to it being flaked.
Below are some pictures of the SWB cast. If you look closely at the cast with a magnifying glass you can see some flat places or "islands" on both faces of the blade. These islands are where the flakes did not run entirely across the face of the blade which left these flat spot islands. We have circled these spots on the cast so anyone who has a cast can find them easily as well.
On the top side of the divot(top side in reference to the picture here) you can also see small scars that appear to show where an island was pried out to form the divot.
Is it possible that the blade laying in the ground for 500 years rubbed these flat spots? That is possible, but if so, why didn't the entire blade rub flat?
This is the same method(ground then flaked) we used to make our SWB replica which has an average thickness of .22 inches compared to the cast which has an average of .17 inches. Below is a side view picture of our replica next to the cast.
For reference, we will call the side WITHOUT the divot as Side 1, which is the top picture. On side 1 we have circled 3 spots where the flat spot islands are located.
Below is the picture I mentioned above comparing the SWB replica to the SWB cast.
Below are some pictures of the SWB cast. If you look closely at the cast with a magnifying glass you can see some flat places or "islands" on both faces of the blade. These islands are where the flakes did not run entirely across the face of the blade which left these flat spot islands. We have circled these spots on the cast so anyone who has a cast can find them easily as well.
On the top side of the divot(top side in reference to the picture here) you can also see small scars that appear to show where an island was pried out to form the divot.
Is it possible that the blade laying in the ground for 500 years rubbed these flat spots? That is possible, but if so, why didn't the entire blade rub flat?
This is the same method(ground then flaked) we used to make our SWB replica which has an average thickness of .22 inches compared to the cast which has an average of .17 inches. Below is a side view picture of our replica next to the cast.
For reference, we will call the side WITHOUT the divot as Side 1, which is the top picture. On side 1 we have circled 3 spots where the flat spot islands are located.
Below is Side 2 which is the side the divot is on, the divot is actually circled and is the middle circle or the second from the left. So Side 2 has two flat spot islands on it which are also circled.
Below is the picture I mentioned above comparing the SWB replica to the SWB cast.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Interview with Daniel Pierce
Please visit http://www.modern-flintknappers.com/featured-knappers to see our recent interview with flintknapper Daniel Pierce.
Also check out Daniel's site at http://danielapierce.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d4s6c60
Also check out Daniel's site at http://danielapierce.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d4s6c60
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Boy Scouts Demo
We had a very good time yesterday doing a demo for the local Boy Scouts. There are couple videos of it at the video page at www.modern-flintknapper.com or you can also see them at our YouTube channel BillEarnhardtknapin. They are basic videos for beginners but Part 1 does show percussion fluting and Part 2 covers some dorsal ridge abrading.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Bell-Locksburg Blade
I just became aware of this blade. It looks similar to the Sweetwater. You can learn more about it at http://www.arrowheads.com/flint-projectiles-and-knives/413-the-bell-locksburg-blade
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

